Boston Corbett once shook Abe Lincoln’s hand. That happened
just after Corbett arrived in Maryland as part of a NY regiment after Lincoln
called for volunteers when the South seceded from the Union. That this man; who
would go on to be remembered for killing John Wilkes Booth 4 years later; met
the victim of the man he was destined to kill is just one of the many strange
things about this man which the author has chronicled in this carefully researched
and thoroughly engaging book.
Boston Corbett was born Thomas Corbett and took the name of
the city in which he first accepted Jesus Christ. This decision would inform
every part of his life from that moment forward. Put out of your mind
everything which you have heard about this enigmatic and mysterious man and get
ready for a fascinating read. There is much more to his story than just that
singular moment when he shot John Wiles Booth in a tobacco barn.
Scott Martelle does a superb job of bringing to life not
only Boston Corbett’s story, but also in chronicling the Second Great Awakening
of Religious fervor in the United States. The First Awakening was in the years
before the American Revolution, as the colonists stretched the wings of their
newly found religious freedom in North America.
The Second Great Awakening; of
which Corbett became a part; occurred just as the Northern half of the country
was embracing the new Industrialism and the South was clinging to its own Agricultural
and slave based economy. And after the war, Corbett’s travels out West in
search of a new life are particularly interesting. He took over an 80 acre
homestead which had been abandoned.
Descriptions of Corbett's time in the infamous Andersonville prison camp are
remarkable for their description of the conditions, as well as how this man
comported himself in a hell on earth. Testimonies from others who were
imprisoned there at the same time all speak fairly well of the man who was
known to be a religious zealot. He spent much of his time ministering to others
and sharing what little he had with those who had even less. This was a very
complex individual.
The book also serves as a reminder of a time when a person
could be as different as they dared to be without too much interference from
either the law, or other people. As you read the book you cannot help but
wonder what the fate of this man would have been were he alive today. It’s a
very pertinent question, which begs whether or not we have really become more
tolerant as a people, or are we now even more restricted in our thoughts than ever
before.
I am very intrigued by this review, and will definitely be looking for this book.
ReplyDelete-Bill