If you believe in the Old Testament, then tattooing your
body is clearly prohibited by Mosaic Law as espoused in Leviticus 19:28, which prohibits
"cutting oneself for the dead" and "putting writing/drawings made by incision on yourselves“. So, it seems pretty clear to me what this
young man’s responsibility to his religion is comprised of when tattooing is
concerned. I am also sensitive to his desire to honor his grandmother, although
totally befuddled by the method in which he chose to do it, as well as her
apparent adoration of him for it.
During the Second World War, at Auschwitz, Livia Rebak was
branded, or tattooed, with the number 4559. This was the way the Nazi’s
dehumanized their victims; turning their names into numbers in a ledger, prior
to annihilating them en masse. Now her grandson, Daniel Philosof, has the same
tattoo. This has me very confused.
On the one hand, it is admirable that he would emphasize
with his Grandmaother, almost as if he were cutting his hair in support of her
undergoing radiation, or chemotherapy. I can understand the reasoning behind
it. But, to mutilate yourself, in violation of your own religion; in effect
acting in concert with the people who defiled your grandmother and her beliefs;
makes no sense to me at all. It’s almost like handing Hitler a Victory lap, voluntarily
scarring another generation of Jews with the same mark of inferiority and
shame, simply for being Jewish.
My own feelings are that he would better serve in honoring
his grandmother by wearing a big Star of David; proudly proclaiming to the
world that he is here in spite of the tattoo which was forced upon his grandmother.
To be sure, this was a very personal decision which both Ms.
Rebak and her grandson have made, and they have that right. But I just wish he
would have opted to go with the Star of David instead. For, in my mind’s eye, I
can see Hitler laughing.
No comments:
Post a Comment