The current contretemps concerning who is a Citizen under
our Constitution seems to be revolving around the term “anchor baby”, which is
a way of referring to a child born on U.S. soil automatically being a citizen. Although
that has long been our accepted policy, the Constitution is not crystal clear
on this issue.
Since this topic is destined to dominate the news for a
couple of days, at least, I thought it might be helpful to post the 2 places in
the Constitution where Citizenship is mentioned. The first is from Article 1;
while the second is from the 14th Amendment, which seems to have become
the “eye of the storm.”
I have synopsized the meaning of each quote from the Constitution
in an effort to give them some historical context.
Article 1, Section
4:8 states “Congress shall have the Power to……Establish an Uniform Rule of
Naturalization…”
This implies that Congress would be responsible for setting
up a bureau to deal with the specifics of Immigration and Naturalization. Today
we call that organization Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, as it is
more commonly referred. At the time it was written many of our leading
citizens; including some of the leading politicians of the time; were not born
here; hence the need to define the term Citizen.
The 14th
Amendment states in Section 1; “All persons born or naturalized in the United
States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and the State wherein they reside.
The point of contention here seems to rest not in the
opening phrase that all persons born here are Citizens, but rather in the
phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The phrase was included as a way
of addressing the issue of “Indians not taxed” in the 2nd Section of
the Amendment.
I hope that this information will prove helpful to the reader as the controversy rolls forward.
No comments:
Post a Comment